Legal Opinion

Norman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1957No. 6 Div. 440PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Norman was, on June 18, 1956, adjudged guilty of carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of twelve.

He failed to present his motion for another trial to the trial judge until 31 days after judgment, thus rendering the motion and the action thereon a nullity, Clark v. State, 38 Ala.App. 480, 87 So.2d 669; Aaron v. State, ante, p. 84, 94 So.2d 415.

Calculating the time for filing the transcript of testimony from June 18, 1956, gave Norman 60 days (Act No. 97, approved February 9, 1956). The filing on August 31 was too late.

Moreover, under Rule 37 (Rev.) of the Supreme Court, Code…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Lane v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Aaron v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Lyons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API