Legal Opinion
DR v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 2000No. 49A02-9908-JV-536Published
1Opinion of the Court
729 N.E.2d 597 (2000)
D.R., Appellant-Respondent,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Petitioner.
No. 49A02-9908-JV-536.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
June 7, 2000.
Steven J. Halbert, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.
Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indiana, Christopher L. Lafuse, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge
Appellant, D.R., challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his adjudication of delinquency for an act which, had it been committed by an adult, would have constituted disorderly conduct.[1] Specifically,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woods v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Blackmon v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Miller v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- D.R. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. EilersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.