Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Buck Stove & Range Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1905No. 13,873PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Morris district court; Oscar L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Clark A. Smith, J. :

This suit was begun in 1896 and is now brought to this court for review the third time. (Vickers v. Buck, 60 Kan. 598, 57 Pac. 517; Vickers v. Buck, 65 id. 97, 68 Pac. 1081.) The last trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error. It was an attempt to set aside a fraudulent conveyance.

The first error argued in the brief of plaintiffs in *585error is the denial of the motion for a change of venue. An application for a change of venue is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and it is not shown…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Buck Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Vickers v. Buck Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pedi Bares, Inc. v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  2. Nordman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Video Engineering Co. v. Foto-Video Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Tiernan v. Chicago Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  5. Dennis v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API