Legal Opinion
Lamkin v. Succession of Filhiol
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 1, 1909No. 17,269PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita; James Pemberton Madison, Judge. Suit by E. T. Lamkin, tutor ad hoc of the minors, Aloysius Roland Filhiol and Nancy Ruth Filhiol, against the succession of R. M. Filhiol, deceased, and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
This suit is brought by the x'laintiff, styling himsfelf “tutor ad hoe” of the minors, Aloysius Roland Filhiol and Nancy Ruth Filhiol, who are declared to be “the minor children of R. M. Filhiol, late of the parish of Ouachita.”
In the petition filed by him he alleges:
“That R. M. Filhiol departed this life in the parish of Ouachita on the 18th of May, 1906, leaving a large succession, which was opened in said parish and was then being administered upon in the district court for Ouachita parish by Inez Schmidt, executrix; that said R. M. Filhiol was 58 years…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bussy & Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- Gates v. Bank of PattersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State ex rel. Mauberret v. RightorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BengtsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Birmingham Transfer & Traffic Co. v. StillAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Bengtson v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1955
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BengtsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956