Legal Opinion
People v. Hernandez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 26, 2002PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant failed to specifically object with regard to the *390legal sufficiency of the evidence on the ground he raises on appeal. Therefore, his arguments regarding this issue are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Seabrooks, 289 AD2d 515, Iv denied 98 NY2d 640). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish thé defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. SeabrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. TerrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. HickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.