Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM RHEA. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Rhea County.- — Joseph H. Higgins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice M’Alister

delivered tie opinion of tie Court.

Luke Smith, a minor, brougit tiis suit by iis next friend against tie Dayton Coal & Iron Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while working in defendant’s mines.

Tie declaration embraces tiree counts, and complains (1) of tie negligence of tie mine boss in failing to properly inspect tie mine; (2) for breaci of duty on tie part of defendant in failing to fumisi plaintiff a safe place to work; (3) tie failure of defendant to warn plaintiff of tie danger.

A demurrer was interposed to tie first and second counts of tie declaration, assigning…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  2. McCutcheon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Finalyson v. Utica Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Jamison v. BurtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Heald v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norman v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Overstreet v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  3. Williams v. McElhaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Judy Hamilton v. Robert BeanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Greene v. RimmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API