Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; J. L. Camp, Judge. Action by E. G. Hicks against J. E. Murphy and another. Prom an order dissolving a temporary injunction, the plaintiff ¡appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order dissolving a temporary injunction, which restrained C. W. Kuy-kendall from selling certain lands as substitute trustee under a deed of trust. There is no statement of facts in the record, and we are confined to the consideration of questions arising upon the pleading.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court had no authority to dissolve the temporary injunction because no answer was filed, but merely a motion to dissolve. The instrument is styled, “Motion to Dissolve Injunction,” and is so referred to by the court. It begins as follows: “Now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gillis v. RosenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Paris v. SturgeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Dawson v. BaldridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Smith v. Palo Pinto CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Cotulla v. BurswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lee v. Howard Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Manes v. BletschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. King v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Pacheco v. AllalaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Jackson v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API