Legal Opinion
Lauderdale v. Texas Department of Agriculture
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 29, 1996No. 03-95-00567-CVPublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
In a contested-case proceeding, the Texas Department of Agriculture issued a final order imposing administrative penalties (one for $1,500, another for $15) against Kenneth Lauderdale, doing business under the trade name Lauderdale Aerial Service, for violating statutory provisions and a Department regulation pertaining to pesticide application. See Tex.Agric.Code Ann. § 76.116(a)(1), (6) (West 1995) (the “Code”); 4 Tex.Admin.Code § 7.22(a)(1) (1995). In Lauderdale’s suit for judicial review of the order, brought under authority of Code section 76.1555(n), the district court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Burke v. Central Education AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3Cited by75 opinions
- Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Hammack v. Public Utility Com'n of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Heat Energy Advanced Technology, Inc. v. West Dallas Coalition for Environmental Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Reliant Energy, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Ford Motor Co. v. Motor Vehicle Board of the Texas Department of Transportation/Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.