Legal Opinion
Harasim v. Kuchar
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 2, 1988No. 86 C 9931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
Three defendants have moved for summary judgment on Count II of the Second Amended Complaint. The facts set out below resolve all factual disputes and draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs’ favor.
Plaintiffs Andrew Harasim and Anna Cudzich resided at 3749 W. 70th Place, Chicago, Illinois at the times relevant to this suit. Harasim and Cudzich are a married couple. Cudzich’s mother owned the residence and also lived there. Cudzich’s brother Andy had lived at the residence in 1980, but not during 1985 or 1986 which is the time relevant to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- George Jones, Cross-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- George Rakovich v. Gregory Wade and Darryl Drake, George Rakovich v. Chester KassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Andrew Powe v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Phillip LauterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. StinsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Joye v. Richland CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1999