State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Voinovich
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This cause came on for further consideration and upon consideration thereof,
*1209IT IS ORDERED by the court that the requests for clarification be, and the same are hereby, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the effect of the stay granted in the court’s decision of April 8, 1994, 69 Ohio St.3d 225, 631 N.E.2d 582, is to require the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and the Industrial Commission of Ohio to continue operations under the status quo as it existed on April 8, 1994, staying only the programs authorized, but not yet implemented, under Am.Sub.H.B. No. 107.
IT IS FURTHER…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. VoinovichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Hyams v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re LongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.