Legal Opinion

Tucker v. City of Moultrie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Mitchell. Colquitt superior court. January 12, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

1. A municipal corporation has authority, under the general-welfare clause in its charter, to pass an ordinance prohibiting the keeping of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of unlawful sale. Cunningham v. Griffin, 107 Ga. 690 (2); Reese v. Newnan, 120 Ga. 198.

2. A conviction under such an ordinance on one day is no bar to a conviction for keeping the same liquors for that purpose on a.subsequent day.

3. One living in a “ dry town,” who has at his home “ cased whisky ” and “37 pints of liquor in his trunk,” and receives by railroad whisky by the case hilled “Mineral Water,” some of whose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reese v. City of NewnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Cunningham v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaver v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Williams v. City of TiftonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Union & Mechanics Club v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. City of Atlanta v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Kenimer v. State Ex Rel. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API