Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yacko v. Curtis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 23, 2003No. 4-01-0807Published

1DissentJustice Cook

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the decision of the trial court.

On August 18, 1997, Anthem sent Curtis the following “Notice of Cancellation”:

“Dear Insured,

As you know, you have a premium due 08/31/97. If you have already sent this payment to us, we thank you for your prompt attention.

If, however, you have not yet sent it to us. [sic] Please remember that this payment is due in our office on 08/31/97. Having it here before that date will avoid cancellation of this policy.

If this payment is not received by us before 08/31/97, then this notice will serve as a notice of cancellation for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. RatayzcakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Cormican v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Bates v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. First National Bank v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Textile Maintenance v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API