Legal Opinion

Gross v. Village of Merrimac

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The merits of this controversy have been fully briefed and argued, but in the state of the record are not before the court and cannot be considered.

The order complained of does not purport to be a temporary injunction but this must be held to be its effect. It was made before issue joined, upon an order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue, and the complaint of plaintiff and certain affidavits constitute the sole basis for the order. It cannot be supposed that the trial court intended finally to dispose of the merits of this controversy in such a fashion.

This being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valley Iron Works Manufacturing Co. v. GoodrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fassbender v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ManskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Madison Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API