Legal Opinion

Empire Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. Otero Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1982No. 81SA30PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether Colo.Sess.Laws 1980 ch. 52, 5-3— 105 at 444 (Senate Bill 20) is unconstitutional because it was not encompassed by the Governor’s call to the legislature as required by Colo.Const. Art. V, § 7. In this declaratory judgment action, the trial court determined that Senate Bill 20 met that constitutional requirement and granted summary judgment for the plaintiff, The Empire Savings, Building and Loan Association (Empire). The defendant, Otero Savings and Loan Association (Otero), then brought this appeal.1 We affirm.

I

The facts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Parsons v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  3. In re Governor's ProclamationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. People ex rel. McGaffey v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. In re Amendments of Legislative BillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wieder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Wieder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API