Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court. Heard before the Hon. John C. Carmichael. The facts1 in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Cited Merritt et al. v. Elvrm, 22 S. 11. 514, 116 Ala. 278; Burke v. Taylor, 10 S. R. 129; Wilkmson et al. v. Willdnson- et al., 30 S. R. 578; Daugherty v. Powe, 30 S. R 524; Kennedy v. Marra-st, 46 Ala. 161.

1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.

On the 8th day of April, 1903, Mitta Jackson, the complainant in this- case, borrowed from the Citizens Bank of Bessemer one hundred eight and 70-100 dollars, and to secure the payment- of the loan executed to the bank a mortgage on a toAvn lot located in the toAATOL of Brighton in Jefferson county. The mortgage was payable thirty days from the date of its execution.

Sometime in July, 1903, the exact day is not shoAvn, the mortgage AAras transferred to Eli Hudson by the bank, but the transfer did not conA^ey the legal title of the mortgagee in the lands.

On the 7th day of May, 1903, and after…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Hardeman v. DonagheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Dailey v. KoeppleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API