Legal Opinion

Neils v. Bohlsen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1930No. 27,951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Intervener appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to Ms complaint in intervention.

In March, 1929, the intervener sold to John A. Bohlsen an automobile on a conditional sales contract note. It was not filed with the register of deeds until June 3, 1929. On May 9, 1929, Bohlsen was adjudicated a voluntary bankrupt. The trustee was appointed May 23, 1929. On June 20, 1929, he commenced this action in replevin against Bohlsen to get possession of the'automobile. Appellant intervened. He alleged the foregoing facts in his complaint and further that on May 9, 1929, and since there was a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. In re BazemoreDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1911
  4. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  5. Clark v. B. B. Richards Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stipe v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. C. I. T. Corporation v. CordsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Goodrich Silvertown Stores of the B. F. Goodrich Co. v. A. & A. Credit System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. In re P.T.G. Grain ServiceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
  5. Robie v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API