Smulls v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ANN K. COVINGTON, Judge.
Herbert Smulls, appellant, appeals from his Rule 29.15 hearing denying post-conviction relief. He challenges, among other issues, the ability of any judge in St. Louis County, including the judge who presided over his Rule 29.15 proceeding, to conduct the proceeding fairly and impartially. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
In State v. Smulls, 935 S.W.2d 9 (Mo. banc 1996), this Court reviewed appellant’s motion to disqualify the trial judge, Judge Corrigan, from presiding over appellant’s Rule 29.15 hearing. ' This Court held that the judge erred in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- McFadden v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- Smulls v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.