Legal Opinion

Ballantyne v. Rusk

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 6, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltimore City (Harlan, C. J.), overruling exceptions to the ratification of the sale reported by the trustee in this cause.

1Opinion of the CourtRussum, J.

The appellant was a purchaser of a parcel of real estate situated on the north side of Gay street, in the city of Baltimore, at a public sale made by the appellee, as trustee, under the decree of the Circuit Court No. 2, of that city. He has excepted to the ratification of the sale upon the ground that the bill of complaint does not set forth sufficient facts to give the Court jurisdiction in that there was no allegation that the property “ could not be divided *650without loss or injury/’ or that “ it would be for the benefit and advantage ” of the infants to have it sold.

The bill was filed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thruston v. MinkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  2. Earle v. TurtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  3. Wilson v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Tucker v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Trustees of the Samuel Ready School for Female Orphans v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API