Legal Opinion
Joubert v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided April 30, 1999No. A-6540Published
1Opinion of the Court
977 P.2d 753 (1999)
Hurist JOUBERT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Alaska, Appellee.
No. A-6540.
Court of Appeals of Alaska.
April 30, 1999.
Maria Bahr, Assistant Public Defender, and Barbara K. Brink, Public Defender, Anchorage, for Appellant.
Kenneth M. Rosenstein, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Special Prosecutions and Appeals, Anchorage, and Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellee.
Before: COATS, Chief Judge, and MANNHEIMER and STEWART, Judges.
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
Hurist Joubert appeals his conviction for third-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance.[1] He maintains…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.