Legal Opinion

State v. Cleaton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1999No. 14-98-01405-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The State of Texas (“State”) appeals from the trial court’s habeas corpus judgment. Larry Clifford Cleaton (“Cleaton”) was indicted for the offense of possession of Testosterone, a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.117(a) (Vernon Supp.1999). He filed a pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus requesting to be discharged from prosecution because he was in lawful possession of the controlled substance. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court granted the requested relief and discharged Cleaton. On appeal to this Court, the State contends that…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RamzyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Ex Parte DrennerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Ex Parte HammondsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Ex Parte OverstreetCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Childress, JasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Ex Parte Jordan Price, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2019
  3. The State of Texas v. Cristian Antonio Lopez-Miranda, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API