Legal Opinion

Bowser v. First National Bank of Oakland, Maryland

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 28, 1975No. K-75-71PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this case, husband and wife, have instituted this pro se suit, seeking to restrain the two banks, as defendants, from honoring summonses directed to them by the Internal Revenue Service, requiring the production of documents and information pertaining to the plaintiffs. The provisions of the summonses which are set forth in footnote 1 below are quite broad. 1 The Internal Revenue Service was given the opportunity to intervene in this case but has declined to do so after having appeared specially through a government attorney solely for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Callahan v. First Pennsylvania BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. United States v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OAKLANDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API