Legal Opinion

Hollon v. McComb

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1981No. 5512PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

The judgment from which this appeal arises held that appellants were entitled to foreclose on a mortgage given by appellees in connection with their purchase of a house. But, the judgment further ruled that the appellees could reduce the amount owed on the note by a setoff of their claim against the appellants for breach of warranty. The appellants have challenged that judgment on three bases. First, they contend that the trial court failed to impose upon the appellees the duty to mitigate damages. Second, they argue that the district court mistakenly allowed the setoff to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Koppers Co., Inc. v. Inland Steel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API