Legal Opinion · Dissent

Union Oil Co. of California v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 20, 1973No. 700-71Published

1DissentSkelton, Judge

I do not 'agree with the decision of the court. The facts are stipulated and involve the merger of Union Oil Company of California (Union) and Pure Oil Company, 'a corporation, of Ohio ¡(Pure). Pure was merged or absorbed into Union. Thus, 'Union became the “acquiring” corporation and Pure became the “absorbed” corporation. The parties agree that the merger was governed by the laws of Ohio.

After the merger, Union issued stock in the new corporation on a pro rata basis previously agreed upon to its old stockholders and to the old stockholders of Pure. Union paid *125documentary stamp taxes in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. American Processing & Sales Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  3. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank, a Body Corporate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. American Mail Line Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Cleveland City Railway Co. v. First National Bank of New YorkOhio Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API