Legal Opinion

Kilinski v. Melendez

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel Palmieri, J.

The issue here is whether to consolidate a pending small *56claims case for property damage with a pending Supreme Court case for personal injury, where both cases arise from the same accident, but the roles of plaintiff and defendant are reversed as to each pending case.

The motion of plaintiffs in action No. 1 to remove action No. 2, presently pending as a small claims case in Nassau District Court, and consolidate it with action No. 1 pending in this court, is denied.

Plaintiff Kitty Kilinski, while a passenger in a vehicle owned by her husband, Zenon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steuerman v. BroughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Victoria Kitchens, Inc. v. LeinerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API