State v. Shaun M. Sanders
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Concurrence
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (concurring).
¶ 56 I agree with the court of appeals that "[w]ithout question, *551the law did not clearly provide that Sanders could not be prosecuted for criminal sexual acts he was alleged to have committed prior to age ten." State v. Sanders, 2017 WI App 22, ¶ 29, 375 Wis. 2d 248, 895 N.W.2d 41. Neither the legislature nor the courts have addressed this specific issue.
¶ 57 As we have previously stated, "failure to raise arguments that require the resolution of unsettled legal questions generally does not render a lawyer's services outside the wide range of professionally…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Reginald D. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.