Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coroniti

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1944No. Appeals, 145 and 153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The defendant and his wife were the owners and occupants of the eastern half of a double frame dwelling located in Kulpmont, Northumberland County, which had been acquired by them in 1936 for the consideration of $1,700. About 9:15 p. M. on March 6, 1942, a fire, which had been preceded by an explosion, broke out in this house and it and several others in that immediate vicinity were consumed. Defendant and his wife carried $3,000 insurance on the building and $2,000 on its contents. The defendant was arrested and in-dieted on two bills of indictment. No. 48 May…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MustoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Commonwealth v. ValerosoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. COHENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. CoronitiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Commonwealth v. COHENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API