Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dubinsky v. Weinstein

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 10, 1967No. 52079PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Judge.

In this original proceeding in prohibition relator seeks to prevent the respondent, as Judge of the Juvenile Division of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, from proceeding further upon a petition relating to the care and custody of her daughter, Judith Ann Dubinsky, a child five years of age. After respondent had overruled relator’s motion attacking the jurisdiction of the court in said cause we issued our provisional rule upon petition of relator.

The facts are not in dispute. Harlan A. Dubinsky and relator, Shirley K. Dubinsky, are the parents of Judith Ann. On January 16,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Wakefield v. ThorpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Schumacher v. SchumacherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. McCoy v. BriegelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Petitt v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Shirley S. Schwartz v. Noah WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. In Re the Marriage of WoffordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Catholic Charities of St. Louis v. HoesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Leventhal v. LeventhalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API