Lloyd v. Admr., Bureau of Workmen's Compensation
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Seneca County, entered upon a jury verdict, determining that the claimant, Charles Lloyd, is entitled to compensation under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act by reason of an injury allegedly sustained while an employee in the service of the Sentle Trucking Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Sentle. Lloyd had appealed to that court from a denial by a regional board of review of his claim for compensation, the Industrial Commission having refused appeal thereto from such denial. Sentle and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Industrial Commission v. AhernOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Taylor v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ashbrook v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Egypt Farms, Inc. v. LepleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Pierce v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1966