Legal Opinion

State v. McDonnell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 1989No. 87-CR-0110-TM; CA A45878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for burglary II, theft I and conspiracy to commit burglary II. ORS 164.215; ORS 164.055; ORS 161.450. The court merged the conspiracy and theft convictions with the burglary conviction for purposes of sentencing only. Defendant assigns as errors that the court failed to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal and failed to merge the conspiracy and theft convictions into the burglary conviction and vacate the first two. We vacate the conspiracy and theft convictions and otherwise affirm.

On his first assignment, defendant asserts that the state’s evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HullOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. SimsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. RoperOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API