Hummel v. Vicaretti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered April 8, 1988 in Sullivan County, upon a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiffs on the issue of liability.
In a bifurcated trial of this action, the jury found defendants 65% liable and plaintiffs 35% liable for the happening of an accident on defendants’ property. From the evidence introduced at the trial the. jury could have found the following to be fact. For quite some period of time prior to March 1, 1986, operators of recreational-type vehicles used the "pipeline trail” which ran through property owned by defendants. To…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Diemer v. DiemerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Halvorsen v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. DainackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Van Derzee v. Knight-Ridder Broadcasting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Chesko v. CheskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Talcott v. ZurendaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Boomer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.