Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Dent

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 10, 2011No. 2:09-mj-00256Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment” (doc. no. 24), which plaintiff opposes. Defendants have filed “Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” (doc. no. 25), which plaintiff has highlighted as true, false, or irrelevant (doc. no. 34, disputing the facts in ¶¶ 29-35, 37, 39-40, 42-44, 57-58, 60-67, 69, 71, and 75). 1 Having carefully considered the record, including the pleadings, briefs, and exhibits, the Court will deny the defendants’ motion, with one exception, for the following reasons:

I.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API