Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Land Credit Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1914No. 18,557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

OPINION DENYING A REHEARING., Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Per curiam

In a petition for a rehearing it is charged that the following statement in the opinion is not true: “Upon a challenge of the abstract, however, it is admitted that these tables are not in the transcript.” (Chambers v. Trust Co., ante, pp. 30, 41, 139 Pac. 1178.)

In view of this charge, the challenge, and reply to the challenge, are now stated. The challenge is:

“The appellees . . . challenge the correctness of appellant’s abstract . . . and show that the following matter, contained in said abstract . . . namely
“ ‘Plaintiff’s Counsel:
“ ‘We offer in evidence all the books, papers, records and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chambers v. Land Credit Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Medill v. McIntireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API