Legal Opinion

Hoevenaar v. Lazaroff

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2004No. 03-4119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Cornelius Hoevenaar (Hoevenaar) is a native American of Cherokee ancestry currently serving a life sentence in the Ohio prison system. While incarcerated, Hoevenaar began to practice a native religion which contains as one of its tenets a requirement that he not cut his hair. As a result, Hoevenaar claims that prison rules regulating hair length violate his right to practice his religious beliefs and are in violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. (2000).

Following a hearing on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jan M. Sexton Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, Russell Bragg, a Troy Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Hoevenaar v. LazaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cornelius Wayne Hoevenaar v. Alan LazaroffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hoevenaar v. LazaroffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API