Herrold v. Case
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentGrady, C. J.
(dissenting)—I am unable to concur in the conclusions reached by the majority opinion. The fundamental error voiced by the opinion, as I view it, is in attempting to draw an analogy between the statutes relating to the sale arid leasing of school lands and those relating to tidelands- upon which there are not natural beds of oysters, but upon which oysters can be propagated if planted. I think a portrayal of the history of the two subjects and a consideration of the different public policies involved, will so demonstrate. In my discussion, I shall refer to this special type of public lands as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Pelton v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Powers v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1907