Legal Opinion

Fulton National Bank v. City of Lancaster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1933No. Appeal 413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit brought to recover the amount of two interest coupons attached to a municipal bond. As the facts are not in dispute, the question involved is a legal one and is whether the plaintiff bank, the holder of these coupons, or the City of Lancaster, defendant, shall bear the loss of interest occasioned by a theft of a bond with coupons attached.

On October 1,1906, the defendant, a city of the third class, issued certain municipal bonds maturing October 1, 1936. Each of the bonds contained the following provision: ‘ ‘ The city of Lancaster reserves…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McClure v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. County of Beaver v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  4. Mason v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Hamilton AvenueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodin v. State Ex Rel. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. BethlehemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Rittenhouse v. Lukens Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Mershon v. Millerstown BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API