Guidry v. Bernard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentAmy, J.
11 Because I find that the trial court was not manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong in making its findings of fact, I respectfully dissent from the majority decision.
It is a long-standing tenant of Louisiana law that the trial court’s factual findings are subject to the manifest error / clearly wrong standard of review. Snider v. Louisiana Med. Mut. Ins. Co., 13-579 (La.12/10/13), 130 So.3d 922 (citing Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989)). In order to reverse the factfinder’s determinations, the appellate court must determine both that a reasonable factual basis for the determination…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Miller v. LeonardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- In Re Succession of LawlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008