Simon Hutchinson v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Intervenor-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
The only truly debatable issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in failing to grant a motion based on Fed.R. Civ.P. 60(b) to set aside a summary judgment so that newly engaged counsel could present a new theory of liability as well as facts to support that theory. Following our consistent jurisprudence, which requires substantial deference to the district court’s decision denying a Rule 60(b) motion to reopen a case, we affirm the court’s refusal to do so.
These are the facts about which there is no genuine dispute as presented to the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rayford v. Pryor, Jr. v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- John Curtis Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- W. Carey Crutcher, Etc. v. The Aetna Life Insurance Co., Aetna Life Insurance Co. And Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. W. Carey CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McMillan v. MBank Fort Worth, N.A.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1990