Legal Opinion

Simon Hutchinson v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Intervenor-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1987No. 86-4674PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The only truly debatable issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in failing to grant a motion based on Fed.R. Civ.P. 60(b) to set aside a summary judgment so that newly engaged counsel could present a new theory of liability as well as facts to support that theory. Following our consistent jurisprudence, which requires substantial deference to the district court’s decision denying a Rule 60(b) motion to reopen a case, we affirm the court’s refusal to do so.

These are the facts about which there is no genuine dispute as presented to the district…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Rayford v. Pryor, Jr. v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. John Curtis Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. W. Carey Crutcher, Etc. v. The Aetna Life Insurance Co., Aetna Life Insurance Co. And Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. W. Carey CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMillan v. MBank Fort Worth, N.A.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API