Legal Opinion
Smith v. Fishback
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 16, 1938No. 5414PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Justice.
Appellants, other than David S. Mc-Cutcheoh, and appellees were owners of land in Franklin and Titus Counties in and adjacent to the Talco Oil Field. At various dates during the spring and summer of 1936 appellees and appellants, other than McCutcheon, in severalty conveyed by royalty pool contracts, a part of their oil and gas royalty to W. W. Smith as Trustee for the benefit of a private corporation to be organized in the future by and through the efforts of one David S. McCutcheon who was named in said royalty contracts as party of third part. David S. McCut-cheon was to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Haskell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Vick v. George, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
- Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.