Legal Opinion

Dynamic Concepts, Inc. v. Truck Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1998No. G016416PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

— This appeal is brought by an insured who demanded its liability insurer immediately provide independent counsel pursuant to Civil Code section 2860 when the insurer agreed to defend under a reservation of rights in an action involving covered and uncovered claims. The insured’s ultimatum to its insurer was to retain Cumis 1 counsel forthwith or be considered as not having provided a defense at all. The insured unilaterally settled the case, even though the insurer appointed defense counsel, without allowing that attorney to participate because of the reservation of rights.

Th…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. James 3 Corp. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Advanced Network, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Royal Oak Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API