Legal Opinion

Pilzemayer v. Walsh

New York Marine Court

Decided April 15, 1878Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

Where an assignee for the benefit , of creditors is by his acts deemed to have accepted. the *245transfer of a lease held by the assignor, he will not be personally hable for rent which became due before he entered. Thus, when the rent is payable monthly in advance, and the assignee enters in the middle of the month, he is not liable for any portion of the rent of the current month, but only under the covenants of the lease for rent subsequently falling due. (Fowler v. Moller, 4 Bosw. 149; Durand v. Curtis, 57 N. Y. 7; 2 Platt on Leases, 416; 11 Barb. 594.

Judgment in accordance herewith.

See Lynch…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durand v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Graves v. PorterNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Lynch v. RinaldoNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API