Legal Opinion

American Box Mach. Co. v. Crosman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 6, 1893No. 2,758Published

In Equity. Bill for specific performance of a contract. Appeal from the clerk’s taxation of costs.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by respondents, Grosman and the Lynn Box Machine Company, from the clerk’s taxation of costs. In this case the bill was sustained with costs against certain respondents, and dismissed as against the respondents above named, with costs in their favor. 57 Fed. Rep. 1021. The clerk’s taxation gives complainant its entire costs without apportionment, disallowing only items which relate exclusively to the above-named respondents, and allows the latter such items as the clerk held to be special to their defense, but no portion of certain items which were of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simpson v. CaulkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API