Legal Opinion

Richie ex rel. Richie v. Laususe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1994No. 65265PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Kelli Richie (Kelli), by her mother and next friend Denice Richie (Denice), appeal the grant of a motion by intervenors, Valiere Laususe (Wife) individually and for her daughter Ashley Laususe (Ashley), to dismiss the petition for paternity against Michael Laususe (decedent).

On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in (1) granting intervenors’ motion to intervene in plaintiffs’ paternity action because intervenors are not entitled to intervene pursuant to Rule 52.12(a); (2) sustaining intervenors’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Schneider v. Sunset Pools of St. Louis, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. City of St. Peters v. Department of Natural Resources of the State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Goodwin v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A.E. v. M.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Noble v. CorkinConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
  3. Laususe v. Normandy Osteopathic HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Roberts v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Richie ex rel. Laususe v. LaususeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API