Legal Opinion

Matter of Meighan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 7, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying the application of the petitioners for the determination and enforcement of a lien for their services as attorneys for the plaintiff in the action of J oseph Watkins, on behalf of himself and other stockholders of the American Grass Twine Company, plaintiff, against Darius O. Mills et al., defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Ge ay, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meighan v. American Grass Twine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Lazenby v. CodmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Lazenby v. CodmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939