Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, eighth district, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

' Plaintiff sues to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her on the platform of the City Hall station of the defendant company.

After the first trial of-this case, the judgment was reversed by this court (157 N. Y. Supp. 753) for the reason that the trial court submitted to the jury the question whether the injuries were caused by the overcrowded condition of the platform, of which there was no proof, this court saying: “ The case should have been submitted to the jury upon the question as to whether the defendant made provision for moderating undue crowding and whether there was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Hudson & Manhattan RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Reschke v. . Syracuse, Lake Shore and Northern Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Ulrich v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grubb Ex Rel. Grubb v. Kansas City Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API