State v. Geisler
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether evidence derived from a warrantless entry and arrest in the defendant’s home should have been suppressed by virtue of the right to be free from unreasonable searches or seizures guaranteed by article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution.
In our original decision in this case, State v. Geisler, 22 Conn. App. 142, 576 A.2d 1283, cert. denied, 215 Conn. 819, 576 A.2d 547 (1990), vacated, U.S. , 111 S. Ct. 663, 112 L. Ed. 2d 657 (1991) (Geisler I), we concluded that the warrantless entry into the defendant’s home violated the fourth amendment…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. LuurtsemaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.