Legal Opinion
Sauer v. Donaldson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination of an administrative agency made after a hearing required by law, and at which evidence was taken, the agency’s determination must be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 231 [1974]). In the instant case, the determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights should be confirmed since there was substantial evidence to support the conclusion that Delta did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Stephenson v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union Local 100 of AFL-CIONew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Delta Air Lines v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Laverack & Haines, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDonald v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Mill River Club, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Dawson v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Putnam/Northern Westchester Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Westchester County Human Rights CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Herbert v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011