Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

These are two actions for injunctions restraining the board of education from making appointments from certain civil service lists. Plaintiff Hurley is No. 1 of the women on an eligible list for attendance officer, which was promulgated on July 8, 1932. Plaintiff Ciaccia is No. 2 of the men on an eligible list for supervising attendance officer, which was promulgated on December 15, 1933. These lists will be referred to as the “ new lists.”

Prior to the promulgation of these new lists, and in 1928, lists had been promulgated for like positions. These lists will be referred to as the “ old…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burch v. . NewburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Barlow v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. People Ex Rel. Perrine v. . ConnollyNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Brown v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Schieffelin v. KelliherNew York Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hurley v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API