Legal Opinion
State v. Dorko
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 15, 1965No. CR63-78PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DON J. YOUNG, District Judge.
The State of Ohio has moved to remand this criminal prosecution on the ground that its removal here pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442a was- improper.
Defendant’s amended petition for removal, filed on his behalf by the United States Attorney, shows the following. Defendant was an enlisted man in the United States Navy assigned to recruiting duty in Findlay, Ohio at the time of the acts from which the indictment arose. As part of his duty defendant traveled to Defiance, Ohio in an automobile owned by the U. S. Navy and assigned to him for this recruiting trip. On his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Funk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- State of Maryland v. ChapmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1951
- State of Oklahoma v. WillinghamDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1956
- Goldfarb v. MullerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Ebersole v. HelmDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Deniel Morgan v. John T. Willingham, and C. A. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Haggard v. LancasterDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- State of Ga. v. WestlakeDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1996
- People of Puerto Rico v. Santos-MarreroDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985