Legal Opinion

State v. Nipper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 2006No. COA05-909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

A defendant may be properly charged with arson when he burns an outbuilding within the curtilage of an inhabited house.1 In this case, Defendant argues that he was erroneously indicted for arson under section 14-58 of the North Carolina General Statutes when he should have been charged for burning an outbuilding under section 14-62. Because the outbuilding burned was located within the curtilage of the house, we hold that Defendant was properly indicted and convicted for the first-degree arson.

The facts pertinent to this case indicate that following an altercation with his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. FrizzelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API