Legal Opinion

Green v. City of Hamilton

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 9, 1991No. 90-7364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Green brought this Section 1983 action against the Housing Authority of Hamilton (hereinafter “the Authority”), his former employer, alleging that when the Authority discharged him it failed to give him the process due under the federal Constitution. Ruling that Green had no property interest in continued employment as a matter of state law, and thus no federal due process rights, the district court granted the Authority’s motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude Green’s allegations and supporting affidavits raise questions of fact regarding a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Hoffman v. Allied Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wyant v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002
  2. Ledbetter v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993
  3. Hoyt Green v. City Of HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. QC Management, LLC v. Egreen Transport Corporation; Yi Hsuan Wu a/k/a Annie WuDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API